The Scenario:
You are a quantitative analyst at a wealth management firm. A financial advisor needs your help creating an optimal investment plan for a new client. The client has a moderate risk tolerance and wants to invest in a portfolio of three well-known stocks: - “TechGrowth Inc.” (TGI) - “SteadyDividends Corp.” (SDC) - “GlobalInnovate Ltd.” (GIL)
Your team has provided the following forecasts for the next year:
| Asset | Expected Return (E[R]) | Volatility (Std. Dev, σ) |
|---|---|---|
| TGI | 15% | 30% |
| SDC | 8% | 18% |
| GIL | 12% | 25% |
The correlation matrix between the asset returns is:
| TGI | SDC | GIL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TGI | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| SDC | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| GIL | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
The current risk-free rate is 3%.
Your Task:
The advisor sends you a request:
“I need to show the client how we can build a superior portfolio. Can you run the numbers? I want to see the efficient frontier, find the best possible risky portfolio, and then figure out the final allocation for a client with a risk-aversion coefficient of 3.5. Show your work so I can explain the logic.”
What to deliver:
The Scenario:
You are a strategic finance analyst at a large technology conglomerate. The R&D division has proposed a new, ambitious project in the Artificial Intelligence space. The project requires a significant upfront investment and is expected to generate cash flows over the next 10 years.
The CFO is skeptical and has tasked you with evaluating whether the project’s expected return justifies its risk.
Market Data: - 10-Year Government Bond Rate (Risk-Free Rate): 4.0% - Expected Return on the Market Portfolio (e.g., S&P 500): 11.0%
Project & Company Data: - The project’s internal rate of return (IRR) is estimated to be 14.5%. - Your company’s stock has a beta of 1.2. - However, this AI project is significantly riskier than the company’s average business. You have identified three publicly traded “pure-play” AI companies with the following betas: - AI Corp A: 1.6 - AI Corp B: 1.8 - AI Corp C: 1.7
Your Task:
The CFO emails you:
“Is this AI project a go or no-go? Don’t just use the IRR. I need a market-based assessment. Calculate the appropriate required rate of return for this specific project using CAPM. Is it creating value for our shareholders or is it just a risky bet?”
What to deliver:
The Scenario:
You are a junior risk manager at a hedge fund. The fund’s flagship “Global Macro” portfolio is valued at $500 million. Based on historical data, the portfolio’s annual expected return is 18% with a volatility of 20%. You can assume the returns are approximately normally distributed.
The portfolio manager has a quadratic utility function of the form: \(U=E[R] - \gamma \sigma^2 / 2\), with a risk aversion coefficient of 4.
Your Task:
The Chief Risk Officer (CRO) wants a risk report on the portfolio.
“Give me a snapshot of our risk profile. First, tell me the 1-day 99% VaR. Our internal limit is $5 million. Are we in breach? Also, the PM is considering a new trade that would reduce volatility to 18% but also lower the expected return to 16.5%. Should she take it, from a utility perspective?”
What to deliver:
Utility Analysis:
Value at Risk (VaR) Calculation:
Risk Limit Compliance: Does the portfolio’s 1-day 99% VaR exceed the internal limit of $5 million?
Conceptual Discussion: The CRO follows up, “What if the portfolio returns are not normal, but have ‘fat tails’? What does that mean for our VaR calculation? Is our current VaR estimate likely to be too high or too low in that case?” Provide a brief, non-technical explanation.